ITIA sanctions six players in major match-fixing crackdown

The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) has issued severe sanctions against six players for violating the tennis anti-corruption program. These bans range from 2 to 15 years, underscoring the seriousness of match-fixing in professional tennis.

The sanctioned players were part of a larger match-fixing syndicate led by Grigor Sargsyan, a major figure in tennis corruption. This latest crackdown sends a clear message that tennis authorities are determined to eliminate match-fixing from the sport.

Match-fixing in tennis

For many years, there has been an ongoing battle between tennis governing bodies and match-fixing operations. One of the most notorious figures in tennis corruption was Grigor Sargsyan, an American match-fixing kingpin who ran one of the most extensive illegal operations in tennis history.

Sargsyan reportedly recruited over 180 professional players worldwide, persuading them to fix match outcomes for betting syndicates. He primarily targeted lower-ranked players, offering them financial incentives to manipulate matches in favour of betting markets.

Read also

“I like to say that I’m smart enough to listen to people who are smarter than me,” Eubanks defends ITIA’s handling of Jannik Sinner’s doping case

The players recently sanctioned by the ITIA were linked to Sargsyan’s widespread operation, proving that match-fixing remains a serious threat to the sport’s integrity.

The players suspended

A total of six players have been banned as part of the investigation:

• Agustin Moyano received the harshest penalty, with a 15-year ban and a $10,000 fine.
• David Guez, the highest-ranked player involved (career-high ranking of 116), was handed a five-year ban and a $7,500 fine.
• Francois Vibert, Yannick Jankovits, Romain Bauvy, and Jerome Inzerillo were also sanctioned with multi-year bans.

Read also

“As outrageous as Sinner's scenario sounds, we know it could happen”: US Anti-Doping Agency Chief defends ITIA verdict

This case reinforces the reality that match-fixing is still a major issue in tennis. However, some experts argue that the sport needs to implement more preventative measures to reduce match-fixing risks. Suggestions include financial support for lower-tier players, which could help remove the temptation to engage in corrupt activities.

What’s next in the fight against match-fixing?

Despite these strong sanctions, match-fixing remains a persistent problem in tennis. The ITIA’s actions demonstrate a commitment to upholding the sport’s integrity, but further measures may be necessary.

Increased surveillance, stricter punishments, and better financial support for struggling players could further deter corruption and protect tennis’s credibility.

The sport’s governing bodies will now be under pressure to continue improving their strategies to combat match-fixing effectively. It will be interesting to see what steps are taken to ensure that similar incidents do not occur in the future.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Unlock your ultimate tennis experience—subscribe today for exclusive access to top stories.

Subscribe