Alexander Bublik questions on-court interview: "Richard Gasquet should be the one speaking"
ATP
Alexander Bublik showed his respect for fellow player Richard Gasquet after defeating him in the first round of the Open 13 Provenze in Marseille 6-4, 6-4. Despite his victory, the Kazakh disagreed with being interviewed on court, believing the home player should have the spotlight.
The world No. 48 has often found himself at the centre of controversies, but he didn’t hesitate to express his admiration for his opponent. Gasquet, 38, had announced his retirement for 2024 before later reconsidering and deciding to extend his career. He is expected to play Roland Garros this year, along with a few other clay-court tournaments.
At the end of the match, the presenter approached Bublik for the on-court interview, but the Kazakh felt it would be more appropriate to honour Gasquet instead. He criticised the decision not to interview the French star, highlighting his remarkable career as one of France’s tennis leaders in recent decades.
"I have a question: why are you interviewing me and not him after this match? He has had a spectacular career—20 years on the Tour, nearly 1,000 matches—it’s incredible. I don't think I'll ever reach those numbers. I wish him the best when he retires in a few months. He's a French tennis legend."
Bublik will face another home player in the second round, former world No. 17 Ugo Humbert. The French No. 1 entered the tournament as the top seed and received a first-round bye, making this his first match since reaching the Australian Open fourth round, where he lost to eventual runner-up Alexander Zverev.
Just In
Popular News
Latest Comments
- Oooooo.... wow... tell us more... we just live each day waiting for "news" of these two women who don't know when to go away. Why do you keep posting their personal management's weekly press releases?
mandoist11-02-2025 - Hard to believe Emma "understands" all that much about the rigors of a prioritized Life in tennis.mandoist11-02-2025
- "Intensified" ??? Yeah, right. Nothing has changed... nothing has "intensified"; only continued.mandoist10-02-2025
- Bencic is all business right now. If Rybakina is the ice queen, then Bencic is Antarctica—colder, sharper, and seemingly unstoppable. 🔥❄️MrAndreeva07-02-2025
- Creepy.mandoist07-02-2025
- Ouch!!mandoist07-02-2025
- they need to change the rules on the WTA to limit wildcards more effectively like they have on the ATPSososo06-02-2025
- This is just getting beyond ridiculous!! Not to mention unsportsmanlike and unfair to serious up & coming contenders.mandoist06-02-2025
- No, writer, we were not "stunned". If you knew your business you would have been aware of her statement last weekend re: her knee and retirement. The main take-away here is that Simona went out on her own terms. She surely wanted to play again after WTA & ITIA screwed her out of her final productive seasons. Personally, I believed she was going to make this announcement when I saw the President and his family in their box seats. Good for Simone -- now she can move on to other things as she said she would.mandoist04-02-2025
- It sounds seriously absurd that in Davis Cup, (unlike Grand Slams such as the Aus Open), medical time outs off court with the medical staff are not allowed?? I mean, if this was an Aus Open match, and the same thing happened to Gurin then, he would have been able to go off court for official medical time out and make an informed decision whether to resume the match or retire. How come such conditions do not apply in Davis Cup?? I mean, there with Davis Cup, it is even more like a soccer match or basketball game in that teams are playing. And so as with those, it ought to be the case in tennis that if a player needs serious medical time out, then one of the other team mates ought to substitute and each team needs to have stand-ins or understudies in case substitution is needed which will be rare but as we can see here, this kind of circumstance fits. But even if the teams do not go down the road of subbing other team mates in, in case of a health issue like the one which played out here, at least, as in the Aus Open and other Grand Slams, there ought to be time-outs with the health professionals and at the conclusion of these time-outs, the particular decision that has been reached between them and the player needs to be taken on board by the umpire. PERIOD.
Sueiyin04-02-2025
