Former ATP anti-doping head Richard Ings has welcomed the agreement
reached between the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and Italy’s
Jannik Sinner.
The case remains one of the most controversial ones in the history of tennis.
Sinner, often regarded as one of the best players currently
playing in men’s tennis in the singles category, tested positive for the banned
substance clostebol in two doping tests in March last year but miraculously
managed to escape any ban.
The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) declared
him innocent following a detailed hearing where his counsel claimed that the
substance was available in the player’s sample because one member of the
coaching staff had received a cream for the treatment of an injury.
Things turned ugly for the world number one in October last
year when it was announced that the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) appealed
against the ITIA’s verdict in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and
demanded a two-year ban for the three-time Grand Slam winner. However, the
issue finally came to a conclusion on Saturday as
WADA announced that they had
reached an agreement with Sinner, which will result in the player remaining out
of action for three months.
“The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) confirms that it has
entered into a case resolution agreement in the case of Italian tennis player
Jannik Sinner, with the player accepting a three-month period of ineligibility
for an anti-doping rule violation that led to him testing positive for
clostebol, a prohibited substance, in March 2024,” the statement said.
The agreement has been widely criticised by fans and current
tennis players, who stated that such a move has tarnished the image of the
sport. However, former ATP anti-doping head Ings welcomed the decision and
believed that everything was done as per the protocols. In a post on the social
media platform X — previously known as Twitter — he explained that Sinner did
not get any favouritism from the authorities. “I’ve followed and analysed this
case,” he wrote. “This case has been transparent. There is a 32 page detailed
decision of every step of the process. There is now a detailed explanation of
the plea agreement reached for the 3 month.”