Spain’s
Carlos Alcaraz has become the latest high-profile
player to criticise the two-week-long format of the ATP 1000 events. There are nine Masters events organised every year in men’s tennis, and nearly every competition is now being organised in the two-week-long format.
Previously, most of those tournaments were being organised
in a one-week-long format. Ever since the format has been changed, few players
have raised their concerns and criticised the move. Last year, Greece’s Stefanos
Tsitsipas, after taking part in the Paris Masters, questioned the motives of the
ATP behind taking such a move.
“Players aren’t getting the recovery or training time they
need, with constant matches and no space for the intense work off the court,”
he wrote in a post on his official account on the social media platform X — previously
known as Twitter. “It’s ironic that the @atptour committed to this format
without knowing if it could actually improve the schedule, but the quality
likewise. Paris got it right, done in a week. Exciting and easy to follow. Just
how it’s supposed to be. If the goal was to ease the calendar, extending every
1000 to two weeks is a backwards move. Sometimes, it feels like they’re fixing
what wasn’t broken.”
The reigning world number two, Alcaraz, has become the latest high-profile player to criticise the move. The four-time Grand Slam winner, who
is currently taking part in the
Barcelona Open and has already cemented his
spot in the semifinal after beating Australia’s Alex de Minaur in straight sets
with a score of 7-5, 6-3, stated that the two-week tournament is not helping the players.
“The one week ones are better. Some will think that in two
weeks there are days of rest, but that is not the case,” he said as quoted by
Tennis 365. “You train, you have to mentally prepare for the game, prepare for
it… you’re not resting, really. It’s two full weeks. That’s why I prefer the
one-week Masters 1000. For me, it’s better for tennis.”